For The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Volume 4 — A Reader’s Guide, the stored edition analysis reports 228,530 words, 16 hr 34 min estimated reading time, and 17 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 30.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Speeches, addresses, etc., Latin -- Translations into English,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 998 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
229,532 recorded words. 4 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #45847About 950 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
218,462 recorded words. 44 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #52878About 702 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
161,458 recorded words. 292 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #26572Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 94 public books, 94 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergThe fourteen speeches against Marcus Antonius, which Cicero himself called the Philippics, dominate this volume. They are forensic performances in which the orator deploys a wide array of rhetorical tactics: direct invective, historical analogy, appeals to duty, and calculated irony. In the First Philippic, for instance, Cicero frames his criticism of Antony by praising Caesar’s moderation, a move that allows him to condemn without seeming reckless. The translator, Charles Duke Yonge, renders Cicero’s periodic sentences into a formal nineteenth-century English that preserves the orator’s balanced clauses and emphatic repetitions.
Cicero often attacks Antony not by frontal assault but by praising what Antony has failed to do. In the First Philippic he says he will speak “with the same freedom” that Caesar allowed, thereby implying that Antony is less tolerant. This ironic contrast runs through the speeches: Cicero holds up an ideal of republican conduct and lets Antony’s actions fall short. The effect is to make the audience feel the gap between what is said and what is meant, a technique that requires careful reading. Yonge’s translation captures the polite surface while the sting remains visible.
Cicero constantly invokes Roman history to give weight to his claims. He compares Antony to Catiline, recalls the Gracchi, and cites the fate of earlier tyrants. These exempla are not mere decoration; they serve as compressed arguments. By linking Antony to figures already condemned by tradition, Cicero tries to make his case seem inevitable. The reader should note how the choice of exemplum shapes the moral frame: a reference to the elder Scipio suggests ancestral virtue, while a mention of Cinna signals civil strife. Yonge’s translation preserves the names and contexts, though some allusions may require a footnote.
After the Philippics, the volume includes Cicero’s Rhetorical Invention, The Orator, Topics, and other works. These treatises explain the very techniques the speeches exemplify. In the excerpt on induction, Cicero describes how Socrates used a series of analogies to lead an interlocutor to an unwelcome conclusion. The method—starting from admitted facts and moving by resemblance to a doubtful point—is exactly what Cicero does in the Philippics when he compares Antony’s actions to those of earlier enemies of the state. Reading the treatises alongside the speeches reveals the deliberate craft behind the passionate delivery.
Charles Duke Yonge’s translation, first published in the 1850s and reprinted in 1903, uses a formal, Latinate English that mirrors Cicero’s periodic structure. He often renders a single Latin period into several English sentences, breaking the rhythm but preserving the logical sequence. His vocabulary is elevated: “culling it out of this abundance” for a phrase about selecting arguments. This choice gives the English a stately tone but can obscure Cicero’s conversational sharpness. Readers comparing Yonge with a more modern translation will notice how much of the original’s urgency is a matter of syntax and word order.
This volume offers a chance to see Cicero’s rhetorical theory and practice side by side. The Philippics show a master persuader at work; the treatises lay out the principles. Readers may find it useful to read a speech, then turn to the relevant section of the Rhetorical Invention or Topics to see how Cicero’s method matches his precept. The translation, though dated, is consistent and careful, making it a reliable base for study.
Some evenings I still think of Cicero’s Philippics, how argument itself was his solace. And then, from a neighboring shelf, I recall Three Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante, and Goethe whispering of worlds made of breath — a quiet kinship, both trusting language to hold what must not be lost. Three Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante, and Goethe — Themes and Context keeps such company well. It is a gentle comfort, that.
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.
